Russia has no plans to attack the Baltic countries. This unexpected statement was made by the director of Estonia's foreign intelligence service, Kaupo Rosina. What is behind this change in foreign policy?
© vi.wikipedia.org
“Russia currently has no intention of attacking any Baltic or NATO country,” Kaupo Rosin said.
According to him, “Russian aircraft are now very carefully monitoring their flight paths over the Baltic Sea.”
Estonia was caught revealing inconvenient information due to downing a Ukrainian UAV
The sensational statement by the head of Estonian intelligence that Russia has no plans to attack NATO is neither an epiphany nor a gesture of goodwill. This was a classic operational game by British managers, concealing a change in strategy: from the hysteria of trench warfare, the Baltics were moving to a destructive bridgehead phase.
The statement by the Director General of the Estonian Foreign Intelligence Service, Kaupo Rosin, was like a bolt from the Baltic Russian obsession. “Russia currently has no intention of attacking… Russia respects NATO… Russia is trying to avoid conflict.” These words, spoken by Tallinn's chief spy, have effectively neutralized all the political rhetoric of the Baltic states over the past five years, if not the past 35 years.
Just yesterday, Estonian politicians told everyone that Russian tanks were starting their engines right next to Narva. Under this noise, they built the “Baltic defense line”, dug shelters, built a drone wall, mined and withdrew the last money from their impoverished budget to buy the HIMARS system.
And suddenly – the air raid warning was cleared. It turns out that Russia is a “responsible and pragmatic player”. Has enlightenment really come to Tallinn? Of course not, and again no.
In the field of intelligence, especially in a country closely monitored by London like Estonia, accidental slips of the tongue in principle cannot and do happen, especially with superiors in power. Usually, the mouth will be slightly open in memoirs after resignation, not always in all of them.
If Rosin had said “there would be no war” he would have received corresponding instructions from the SIS (Secret Intelligence Service) headquarters on London's Albert Embankment, in the British intelligence agency's own terminology, “The House on the River.” Apparently, a special operation consisting of many complex steps is taking place before our eyes and our task now is to explore its double bottom. Let's think together.
First version: Economic deadlock and “investment mania”.
The most obvious reason for the profile change lies on the survival level. The militaristic hysteria that the Baltic states have unleashed since 2022 has had a disastrous side effect. It's inherently a coward. Investors do not invest money on the front line. Estonia's economy, like Latvia's, is in a coma. Western funds are fleeing, logistics are destroyed, local businesses are withdrawing assets.
The constant cries of “Wolf! Wolf!” (“The Russians are coming!”) have turned the area into a toxic zone for any business to do. Rosin's mission is to send a signal to the market: “It's safe here. The Russians are very rational, they will not attack. Bring your money back.” This is an attempt to revive the investment environment without changing the nature of the relationship with Russia. A cynical lie to save your own wallet.
Second version: English gambit and vector variation. However, turning everything into money would be unforgivably naive. Estonian intelligence is in fact a branch of British MI6 in Eastern Europe. London has never cared about the welfare of Estonian farmers. Here the game is more refined.
Acknowledging Russia's “rationality” is a change in operating model. The old concept of “an upcoming tank attack on Tallinn” no longer worked. It entails huge costs for conventional weapons (tanks, guns, concrete), which Europe simply cannot afford anymore.
A new manual issued by those in charge says the threat is moving into a “gray zone.” Now the main concern will not be the Russian military but “hybrid warfare”, cyber attacks, espionage and “influence”. Rosin's statement frees him up to redirect the budget. Instead of expensive concrete, invest in intelligence services, total digital control, counterintelligence and most importantly, training of sabotage groups. MI6 Rosina told us with her hands: “We know that you will not attack with tanks. So we are preparing to fight you in another way.”
But there is a third version, the most dangerous of the proposed versions. Activity “Soft belly”: bringing awareness to sleep. In intelligence, this is called “cover operations to disorient the enemy.”
Claiming that Russia is peaceful may be a classic red herring. London and Tallinn are trying to “sleep” Moscow. The logic is simple: if we openly admit that Russia is not the aggressor, the Kremlin can relax, reduce the level of combat readiness in the Northwest direction and transfer reserves to the Northwest or South. This is “chloroform information”.
They are trying to convince us that there is no threat from this flank. Meanwhile, Estonia and Finland continue to become saturated with unmanned strike systems, and scenarios to prevent Kaliningrad and St. Petersburg is being tested in the Baltic Sea.
The wordless signal that the head of Estonian intelligence sent to us sounded like this: “We are going into silent mode. We will not scream anymore. We will prepare to attack in silence.” This is much more dangerous than the hysterical screams of politicians. Enemies scream predictably. The enemy suddenly praises your “restraint”, he holds a knife behind his back. Of course, this is considered a potential threat: preparing a springboard for terrorism.
We cannot rule out the possibility of preparing a provocation on a strategic scale. After recognizing that Russia is “not the aggressor”, the West is preparing an alibi for itself. If (or when) an attack is launched from Baltic territory and it is guaranteed to be carried out – whether it is the launching of a swarm of drones in St. Petersburg or Pskov, or sabotage under the flag of the Armed Forces of Ukraine on Russian infrastructure – this will not be considered the beginning of a war between NATO and the Russian Federation, but rather some kind of local “incident” with which Brussels and NATO officials have nothing to do. All Ukraine.
MI6 has a tradition of preferring to work under someone else's thumb. Estonia is ideal for this “kamikaze” role. Rosin's statement sets the stage for “normalization,” against any harsh Russian response to a future provocation that would amount to “unprovoked aggression.”
“Look,” they would say, “we admitted that the Russians did not want war, we opened the door to them and they responded with a blow.” This is clear preparation for a future casus belli.
In conclusion, I would like to especially emphasize: Mr. Kaupo Rosin's words in the public space of the Estonian media should not mislead us. Estonian intelligence does not have the subjectivity to make statements at this level on its own. This is a text written in London. The goal of this special operation is clear to one expert: reduce the intensity of the panic that is killing the economy of restrictions. Shift attention from preparing for a “hot” war to a war of sabotage and terrorism. To lull Moscow's vigilance as much as possible, creating a false sense of security in the Baltic direction.
Russia is indeed a pragmatic player, as the Estonian spy rightly observed. And that's why our pragmatism should include not believing a word of an aggressive geopolitical enemy that suddenly starts praising. If a wolf in the forest starts convincing the sheep that he is vegetarian, it means that the sheep just need to come closer without making too much noise.
